Lines in the Sand

Jan 21, 2021

History is replete with leaders drawing real or metaphorical lines in the sand, challenging opponents to cross only if they dare. David Andelman, an American journalist and author, believes that one way to understand global risks and challenges is to explore the nexus of red lines that define global politics.

David A. Andelman, a columnist for CNN, twice winner of the Deadline Club Award, and executive director of The Red Lines Project, is the author of “A Red Line in the Sand: Diplomacy, Strategy, and the History of Wars That Might Still Happen” and host of its Evergreen podcast. His previous works include A Shattered Peace: Versailles 1919 and the Price We Pay Today. He formerly was a correspondent for The New York Times and CBS News in Europe and Asia and editor and publisher of World Policy Journal. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and past president of the Overseas Press Club of America and the Silurians Press Club. Follow him on Twitter @DavidAndelman.

 


“We all know what the major hotspots are, it’s China in the South China Sea, and Korea and North Korea and the atomic bomb, it’s Iran and their quest for a nuclear weapon, it’s various issues in Mesopotamia, Iraq, and Syria, all across Africa, there are a host of red lines that mostly delineate where terrorists have begun to pop up, some of them refugees from the Middle East and so on, of course, then there are the red lines between East and West, Russia and Western Europe and America, and there are red lines within Europe as well.” —David A. Andelman

History is replete with leaders drawing real or metaphorical lines in the sand, challenging opponents to cross only if they dare. David Andelman, an American journalist and author, believes that one way to understand global risks and challenges is to explore the nexus of red lines that define global politics.  Indeed, Andelman—in this episode of New Thinking for a New World and in his recent book A Red Line in the Sand: Diplomacy, Strategy, and the History of Wars That Might Still Happen—argues that never before have global affairs been so entangled by red lines. Moreover, he says that Donald Trump made everything worse.

Can we recover without a catastrophe?

Listen to the episode here or find us on a podcast platform of your choice (Itunes, Spotify, Acast, StitcherLibsyn, etc). Let us know what YOU think and leave a comment below.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent podcasts

Code Red: not for Earth, for Humanity?

Code Red: not for Earth, for Humanity?

“For the first time in human history, we face a planetary emergency.” Those words were written by Johan Rockström, Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Scientists tend to be sober, measured in their assessments and with a preference for...

Are You Listening?

Are You Listening?

Too many people seem voiceless or, at least, don’t think their voices are heard by those whose decisions shape their lives. Is the problem that too many are voiceless or that too many are not listening? Maybe unanswerable, but we asked some people to try. Please...

Don’t Fool With Mother Nature!

Don’t Fool With Mother Nature!

We live in an era of accelerating, disruptive climate change, with catastrophic consequences that every credible forecast says will worsen. To look for answers we recently organized a conversation with Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka, Francisco Hildebrand and Tero Mustonen....

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap